Review Form for PC Members
1. Content Quality Questions:
1.1 Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?
1.2 Is the research design appropriate?
1.3 Are the methods adequately described?
1.4 Are the results clearly presented?
1.5 Are the conclusions supported by the results?
1.6 Are all figures and tables clear and well-presented?
If you answered otherwise than “yes” to any of the Content Quality Questions above, please justify your answer in “Comments and Suggestions for Authors” (section 6).
2. Quality of English Language
3. Recommendations for PC (will not be shown to authors)
Do you have any potential conflicts of interest with regard to this paper?
Did you detect plagiarism?
Did you detect inappropriate self-citations by authors?
Do you have any other ethical concerns about this study?
If you answered “yes“ to any of the following questions, please give details in the "Comments for PC members" (section 7).
4. Overall Ratings
4.1 Originality/Novelty
4.2 Significance of Content
4.3 Quality of Presentation
4.4 Scientific Soundness
4.5 Interest to Readers
4.6 Overall Merit
5. Are the references cited in this manuscript appropriate and relevant to this research?
(will be shown to authors)
(will not be shown to authors)
8. Overall Recommendation